FMSF NEWSLETTER ARCHIVE - January 17, 1994 - Vol. 3, No. 1, HTML version

Return to FMSF Home Page

3401 Market Street suite 130,  Philadelphia, PA 19104,  (215-387-1865)

This address and the phone numbers have changed as of July 15, 2000

Dear Friends,
  Thank you. When we returned from a two week holiday break, we were
greeted with a most amazing basket of notes and letters of
appreciation. We were deeply moved. It took us three days just to open
and read them all. We hope that when this madness subsides, we will be
able to answer individually and to let you know how much your letters
meant. For now, thank you.
  We start the new year with almost 10,000 families. Imagine, 10,000
families who have contacted the foundation to say that they are
worried about someone in their family who entered therapy and who then
claimed to have recovered repressed memories of abuse taking place 10,
20, 30, even 40 years ago. These alleged memories of abuse took place
repeatedly for decades and often include bizarre rituals and murders -
none of this known to the person before therapy. The families are
distraught because the person they love has cut off contact with
everyone who will not validate the memories. No discussion. No
reason. A refusal to consider alternative explanations. Families say
the person they love has taken a new personality and a new identity as
a "survivor." If any other medical practice had 10,000 complaints it
would be taken off the market. There are no mechanisms for taking
"recovered memory therapy" off the market.
  Critics of the False Memory Syndrome Foundation such as Judith
Herman, M.D. have said that this is a political matter. We suggest
that if that is the case, we are dealing with a witch hunt. A "witch
hunt", according to the American Heritage Dictionary, is "a political
campaign launched on the pretext of investigating activities
subversive to the state." While child abuse is surely a terrible
problem and an unconscionable crime that must be punished, the 10,000
reports that we have received don't really seem to be about child
abuse. Child abuse is a criminal offense. It is a serious matter. It
is a matter for the criminal justice system. Child sexual abuse should
not be trivialized.
  Except for the one out of sixteen reports that results in legal
action, and most of those wither at deposition, the reports we receive
indicate there is not even a pretext of investigation. The patient is
diagnosed as a "survivor" because he or she has "all the symptoms of
abuse." The therapists argue that it is not their job to investigate.
In the vast majority of cases, therapists do not even report their
conclusions about child sexual abuse to authorities. On the one hand,
they claim that the damage done is so great that the patient will need
years and years of therapy. They claim that the danger is so great
that the patient must sever all connection with the family. On the
other hand, all the appropriate government institutions that were
established to deal with such horrible crimes against children are
simply ignored. Such inconsistencies seem to support Dr. Herman's
claim that we are dealing with a political matter.
   Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of the current phenomenon, is
the misuse of science to promote a political end. It is the scientific
issues that are the focus of the False Memory Syndrome Foundation.
Patients have been told that certain things were "scientific" when in
fact they were not. Patients have been led to believe that
"flashbacks" represent historical reality when the research indicates
that "flashbacks" are worst-case scenarios. Patients have been led to
believe that "repressed memories" are somehow more pristine than other
memories when in fact there is no evidence for that. Patients have
been led to believe that techniques such as hypnosis or sodium amytal
or dream interpretation could be used to determine historical accuracy
when in fact memories recovered with such techniques are like other
memories: some true, some a mixture of fact and fantasy, some false.
Patients have been led to believe that all sexual abuse leads to long
term negative consequences when in fact the consequences vary with the
severity and context of the crime. Patients have been led to believe
that huge proportions of the population have been sexually abused when
in fact the definition of sexual abuse is no longer clear and our
society is shamefully ignorant of this data.
  The Foundation has been in existence for almost two years. In all
that time, there has been no serious challenge to the information
about memory that we have provided. Memory researchers are in
agreement on most issues. Memory is not like a videotape recorder that
can be replayed. Memories of events are reconstructed from fragments.
In that reconstruction, events are reinterpreted to make sense in the
here and now. Some memories are surely true, but some are just as
surely a mixture of fact and fantasy or even false.
  Rather than address the work of the Foundation at the level of
issues, critics have only made attacks on persons. At first the
attacks were of the sort that the Foundation was a front for satanic
ritual cult activity, was harboring perpetrators and was funded by the
mafia. Now the attacks are primarily directed at the Foundation
leadership as a way to try to undermine the credibility of FMSF. A
recent article about the family of the Executive Director in
Philadelphia magazine, for example, prominently displayed on its front
cover, "The most dysfunctional family in America." A little bias
perhaps! A columnist for the Boston Globe named Randall Ryan wrote two
hostile columns in December. Without examining the records or speaking
to anyone at the Foundation he stated that the foundation "was
dishonest from its inception and is tainted in its leadership." On
January 1, Mr. Ryan wrote that he had "been assigned to another job at
the Globe."
  The above negative examples are the exception. Most of the media
coverage about FMS shows an increasing understanding of the issues.
Most of the people we speak to in the media understand something that
too many professionals don't yet understand: there are not two sides
to this issue for most people. The fact that people are abused and may
or may not remember is surely not an issue. The fact that some people
who may have forgotten (repressed?) abuse recall it in therapy is
surely not an issue. The fact that people can misremember is surely
not an issue. What is at issue is the way that human beings are
treated. By its silence, the therapy community seems to be saying that
it is acceptable to accuse someone of criminal activity solely on the
basis of a memory recovered in therapy by a distressed patient, that
radical action can be taken on the basis of a recovered memory without
any sort of investigation, even in a situation in which there is no
real danger to anyone because we are dealing with independent adults,
that it is acceptable to accuse a person without providing any
opportunity for the accused person to defend himself or herself. Most
people feel that such attitudes are arrogant, dangerous and cruel. One
concerned professional told us that what is taking place is
psychological elder abuse.
  "Do no harm." Is that still part of the oath taken by medical
professionals? That code is totally meaningless if people who are
affected by the diagnosis and treatment plan are systematically
excluded from consideration. If there is any issue, this is it.
  Most of the professionals with whom we have contact are caring,
hardworking and ethical people who are worried about the excesses that
are rapidly undermining the credibility of the mental health
profession. Other professionals are still having a hard time believing
that this is really going on. When they come to understand the
situation and realize the harm brought by zealotry of a few, they are
distraught. Last week, a professional came to the office to volunteer
for a week. She is a person who has spent her career working with
offenders and victims. She wanted to learn about the Foundation first
hand because in the professional meetings in her state all she was
getting was "negative propaganda." One day she helped us open the
mail. Tears streamed down her checks as she read the reports of
families contacting the Foundation to ask for information. "I had no
idea," she said.
  Families need to help professionals understand what is going on.
This year the efforts of the Foundation will be to work as closely as
possible with the professional organizations. Invite the leadership of
the professional organizations in your state to come to meetings of
families. If they can't come to your meetings, go and visit them. We
need to arrange face to face meetings in which people listen
respectfully to each other.
  10,000 families! When will this end? We must have families and
professionals working together to find ways to help families reunite.
We can't afford to get bogged down in issues of blame. There isn't
time for the people in their 70's and 80's. It isn't necessary.
People make mistakes. Parents make mistakes, children make mistakes,
professionals make mistakes. Disasters happen. Bad things happen. We
need to pick up the pieces and get on with it. Indeed, as sad as all
of this is, it is funny too. Imagine a whole culture getting caught up
with the belief that the proof that something happened is that we
forgot it!
  10,000 families. The office has been busy. There were 900 phone
calls in the twenty-four hours following the Sally Jessy Raphael
program in December. That program featured a mother and daughter
reuniting. In her final soliloqui, Sally raised serious questions
about the uncritical acceptance of accusations in the past decade. A
few days later mention of the Foundation was made in an Ann Landers
column. There were another 900 calls and the letters from that column
are still arriving. Across the country there have been columns and
articles. The fact that so many of you are willing to speak out is
making a tremendous difference. Almost every retractor mentions media
coverage as a factor in reconsidering. The Foundation has been accused
of trying to discredit survivors. That is simply false. People who
have been abused deserve our compassion and our concern. All people,
including survivors, deserve the respect of being given accurate
/                                                                    \
|   Among psychiatrists, a long, growling dispute -- about twenty    |
| years in duration -- has been fought and is now ending between     |
| romanticists and the empiricists, who insist that all the          |
| practices of psychiatry be based upon observation and methodical   |
| study of patients. This dispute is ostensibly about psychotherapy  |
| but actually is about the proper direction psychiatry itself ought |
| to take. At state is who will command the future of psychiatry     |
| and, more important, how patients will come to be treated.         |
|   The empiricists are winning because their approach has expanded, |
| in a clear and gratifying way, our knowledge of mental disorders.  |
| The romantics, in my view, are losing not because they fail to     |
| provide helpful proposals for psychotherapy. This is their         |
| strength. They are losing because, as romantics will, they have    |
| become infatuated by their own thought. They claim to know things  |
| they never try to prove. They are charmed by novelty and ignore,   |
| even disdain, drab facts. More recently, in their thinking they    |
| have taken a nightmarish turn toward chaos that has caused         |
| patients and their families much suffering.                        |
|                                                      Paul McHugh   |
|                                             "Psychotherapy Awry"   |
|                                    American Scholar, Winter 1994   |

ERRATUM (From the issue of February 8)
To FMSF Newsletter Editor:
  "When I sent you the original draft of my letter commenting on the
Linda Meyer Williams study, I did indeed state: "I consider the study
to be an excellent one and I consider the results to be valid." After
I sent you the letter, and thought more about the article, I realized
that there was a major flaw in it that I did not originally
appreciate. Because this flaw was beyond the purposes of my letter, I
called your office and asked you to delete the second half of this
sentence regarding my considering the results to be valid and to
publish only: "I consider the study to be an excellent one."
Unfortunately, this was not done, and the original sentence appeared
in print [below]. I would appreciate your bringing this error to the
attention of your readers. Thank you."  
                                             Richard A. Gardner, M.D.

  Our sincere apologies. The correction had indeed been made but
  somehow in the process of a final proofreading was reinserted.

                     by Richard A. Gardner, M.D.

  In recent weeks an as yet unpublished article by Dr. Linda Meyer
Williams of the University of New Hampshire has been given significant
publicity in the media. One hundred and twenty-nine women with
hospital-chart documentation of their childhood sexual abuses 17 years
earlier were interviewed. Thirty-eight percent of the women had no
recollection at all of the childhood abuses to which they had been
subjected. The women ranged in age from 10 months to 12 years at the
time of the original hospital recording of their abuses and 18-31
years of age at the time of the follow-up study of their recall.
  I consider the study to be an excellent one and I consider the
results to be valid. I have no significant criticisms of the format of
the study itself. I am, however, critical of the authors who consider
this study to provide refutation to those like FMSF (mentioned
specifically by name) who "have suggested that the recovered memories
are fabricated by disturbed or vindictive adults or fostered by
overzealous therapists." The implication here is that FMSF's position
is that all such memories recovered under therapy must be
fabricated. It is very risky making any statements about what a whole
foundation's position is on a subject of such great controversy.
Although I do not speak for FMSF, I do know that my position on this
is. It is this:
  I do not doubt that many people actually forget many things,
including traumas. Whether one wants to label this inability to recall
old events (whether traumas or otherwise) repression or forgetting is
not too important. Such a phenomenon does not preclude, however, the
coexistence of another phenomenon, namely, people who never had a
particular experience being made to believe that they did. The two
phenomena need not preclude one another. In elaboration, mention must
be made of the process of accretion. Normally, we forget a vast
majority of all things that happen to us. If we were to continually
keep in memory -- especially conscious awareness -- all the things
that have ever occurred to us, we would be driven insane. There must
be a process by which thoughts are removed from conscious awareness
and stored somewhere in our brain. And it is reasonable to assume
that these become available for retrieval with varying degrees of
difficulty. All of us may exhibit the phenomenon of progressive
elaboration of a memory after initial recall. More specifically, a
long-forgotten event may be brought into memory by some external
evoking stimulus (such as a friend or relative reminding us of the
experience). Initially, we may recall only a small fragment of the
event. However, with further discussion and "mental searching," we may
be able to retrieve from our memory bank progressively more material
about the event. This process is called memory accretion and is to be
found in everyone.
  When preparing this statement, I did a little experiment on myself
in order to demonstrate how this process might work for me. I reached
over to my bookshelf on which I have stored some old books dating back
as far as my early teens. I opened the graduation yearbook from Public
School #82 in the Bronx (in New York City) from which I graduated in
1945 (at the age of 14). I have not picked up that book in at least 10
to 15 years and probably have only looked at it two or three times
since graduation. It sits there as an old yellowed, fragile memento of
what is simultaneously a million years ago and, at the same time, only
yesterday. I decided in advance to make a list of things that I could
honestly say I never would have thought about again had I not opened
the book but which, upon perusing the book, might result in their
springing into clear memory.
  This is what resulted: I saw the names of two English teachers who I
am certain I never would have thought about through the remainder of
my life. Yet, seeing their names in he book immediately brought forth
very specific memories of my experiences with them. I noted my name on
a list of contributors to a science fair at a nearby high school, the
Bronx High School of Science. Prior to seeing the notation, I had
absolutely no memory of that event and, if someone had asked me about
it, I would have denied that there was such an event. The title of the
presentation was "Physiology of the Frog." Seeing my name next to that
title immediately brought forth memories of experiments that I used to
conduct with frogs' legs and their reflexes. I am certain that I never
would have thought about that science fair again had I not read about
it in my old yearbook. Opening the book also resulted in my thinking
about Fritz, "my bully," a bigger boy who victimized me and other more
studious types. Thoughts of the humiliations I was subjected to at his
hands brought about a transient reliving of some of those old insults.
I could go on, but I think the reader gets my point. I believe any of
the readers would have a similar experience.
  Does it really matter what label we give to the phenomenon by which
I remembered once again my two English teachers, my science fair
experience, and Fritz? Does it really matter whether one labels this
phenomenon recall of forgotten memories or recall of repressed
memories? I could easily envision a therapeutic experience in which
the same memories might be brought to conscious awareness and focus. I
can easily envision a therapist saying to me, "Did anyone ever bully
you in junior high school?" And I can readily imagine the question
immediately evoking a recollection of Fritz, "that son-of-a-bitch."
Accordingly, the Williams study is not surprising. There are people
who were abused, who have forgotten that they were, and who will
recall their abuses in the context of therapy -- especially a therapy
focusing on past sexual abuses. This fact does not, however, preclude
the existence of another phenomenon, namely, overzealous therapists
inducing their suggestible patients into believing that abuses
occurred that never took place. One can "believe in" the phenomenon of
repression (or forgetting, or whatever else one wants to call it) and
still also "believe in" the phenomenon of false sex-abuse
accusations. One does not have to take a choice. Those who consider
the Williams study to demonstrate that FMSF denies entirely the
phenomenon of repressed memories are oversimplifying the situation and
are certainly not speaking for one person who has no problem
recognizing both the phenomenon of false accusations of sexual abuse
and the phenomenon of false accusations of sexual abuse allegedly
derived from repressed memories.

                       THERAPIST OR VALIDATOR?

  While working on an article, Richard Bernstein visited a counselor
at University of New Hampshire's Sexual Harassment and Rape Prevention
Program and asked her about the numbers of women who had come to her
organization for help. "We had 130 sexual assault survivors and
significant others," the counselor told him. Among them were seventy-
three 'sexual assault survivors' and thirty-five 'child abuse and
incest survivors.' Bernstein asked if the women given the 'survivor'
designation were found to have actually been victimized or if they
just said they had been victimized.
  "If a person thinks she's been victimized," LeGault said, "we're
here to validate that experience."
                                    Richard Bernstein
     "Guilty if Charged"  The New York Review,  January 13, 1994

                             MORE ON MPD

  The number of questions we receive about Multiple Personality is
increasing. Clearly, this is a topic of concern to many people. When
there is such disagreement within the profession about MPD, it is time
to look at it from another perspective. A book we have found helpful
in this respect is "The Passion of Ansel Bourne: Multiple Personality
in American Culture" by Michael Kenny, Smithsonian, 1986. An
anthropologist, Kenny argues that "multiple personality is a
culturally specific metaphor, not a universally distributed mental
disorder. Like possession it is a way of representing distress
embedded in the circumstances of time, place, and culture; like
possession it is reinforced by the willingness of others to accept its
reality...the disorder has discernible cultural origins both as a
medical concept and as a mode of behavior. However, those who deploy
the concept -- and on the other side those who accept specialist word
as to its validity -- have little sense of its culturally unique
qualities nor of its history within Western psychological thought."
(p 3)

                             LEARNED MPD

  We received an article from a woman named Lauri about her personal
experience as an MPD patient. She referred to her encounter as
Learned Multiple Personality Disorder, which we thought an interesting
term. Her story is much too long for us to print in its entirety
here. We thought that a section entitled, "Learning to be a good
patient" was insightful:
  I was not the only MPD patient. My therapist had a group of five
women participating in this dysfunctional, cult-like treatment. Our
therapist was using mind games to control us and convince us he was
the only person who could help us. In "private", he would drop
comments about the other MPD "girls." As patients, we became very
competitive and jealous of each other.
  I was especially jealous of one woman who was very pretty. He had
made sexual advances toward one of her sexiest alters, and I was
convinced he was infatuated with her. He would play his guitar and
sing for her, but never me. He compared the two of us and said we were
very much alike. He often confused our names which made me feel
hurt. I wanted him to like me in the way he liked her.
  I clearly understood the sickest patient received the most
attention. So, I devised behavior that would get his attention: act
like a five-year-old, come intoxicated to my session, threaten him
with a knife, or even attempt suicide. Every one of us in the support
group were in some way in love with our psychologist.
  I wanted to be the best. I became a model MPD patient and exhibited
all the right traits. I learned MPD and let it in, but soon it took
control of my mind and body.
  The doctor decided I needed five to seven years of therapy. He
explained to me and my husband, "Because Lauri now has MPD behavior,
it follows that she had MPD. Thus, some terrible abuse in her
childhood must have caused it. So terrible that she's repressed those
memories deep in her mind. With my help, the alters will reveal the
abuse, then she'll remember her own experiences. Finally, she will
work through those old feelings and get better."
  This is about the time he raised his rates to $120 per hour.
  We bought it, and I worked hard to recall repressed memories. Of
course, there were no real memories, but the mind is an amazing
thing. Let me explain, in lay terms, how repressed memories were
created on one occasion. The therapist called-up Beth, a 5-year old
alter, and hypnotized her. He suggested sexual abuse had occurred at
the hands of her Daddy. He explained she needed to see a "big movie
screen" in her mind and tell him what she saw. Then, he asked leading
questions about touching, etc. Beth performed just as the therapist
predicted she would. Beth and I were rewarded with much attention and
  In reality, I didn't have those memories, but the doctor considered
them true and wanted more. For months, I allowed other alters to write
anything they could remember. The memories grew worse and worse and I
became horrified. I thought it was all true, and I felt worthless and
  I recalled various fragments of movies, books, talk shows, and
nightly news, and soon I had plenty of child abuse memories. But, it
didn't stop there. Eventually, I said I had taken part in Satanic
Rituals, been buried alive, drank blood, and helped to kill a baby.
With every new memory, my therapist was intrigued and building a case
to prove he was right about me all along. I was rewarded with his
attention to me and was his "best" patient. But, I started to have
feelings of death and became suicidal.
  I truly exhibited all the MPD symptoms even though I had learned
them. Control of my mind, emotions, and will was given to the
personalities the therapist had empowered.

                        TRAINING OF THERAPISTS

  "What kind of training in memory do therapists get?" Different
professions approach the education of future therapists in different
ways and each university has virtual autonomy in designing its own
curriculum. One study of Master of Social Work programs suggests how
little formal training in memory is given to MSW students.
  A paper by Allen Feld to be presented at the Annual Program Meeting
of the Council on Social Work Education, March 1994, reports that
there is very little content on memory, memory retrieval or recall and
repression. Feld conducted a national survey and approximately half
(48) of the accredited programs responded. Only 22 schools reported
content on memory with approximately two-thirds of those programs
offering three or less hours. Sixteen programs reported content on
memory retrieval with almost half of these programs stating they offer
one hour. While repression is more widely included in the MSW
curriculum, the 34 programs again spend very little time on this
content with almost two-thirds offering three or less hours in
programs which typically would take two years to complete. Feld also
notes that social work educators have little formal academic
preparation to teach these subjects and that students are required to
read little material in these areas. When required, they are directed
to non-scientific material more frequently than scientific material.
/                                                                    \
|             Where do 6,007 families live?  Jan 17,'94              |
|      not including 3,850 Potential families and 117 retractors     |
|   AK(11)  AL(20)  AR(20)  AZ(178) CA(928) CO(110) CT(58)  DE(20)   |
|   FL(264) GA(64)  HI(10)  IA(48)  ID(32)  IL(247) IN(72)  KS(53)   |
|   KY(24)  LA(25)  MA(143) MD(98)  ME(31)  MI(192) MN(163) MO(108)  |
|   MS(8)   MT(33)  NC(77)  ND(7)   NE(32)  NH(26)  NJ(139) NM(42)   |
|   NV(24)  NY(270) OH(224) OK(57)  OR(143) PA(302) RI(18)  SC(28)   |
|   SD(14)  TN(46)  TX(233) UT(172) VA(94)  VT(24)  WA(259) WI(170)  |
|   WV(13)  WY(12)  DC(8)   VI(3)   PR(1)  Canada:  AB(19)  BC(66)   |
|   MB(42)  NB(9)   NF(1)   NS(11)  ON(169) PE(2)   PQ(10)  SK(7)    |
|    Australia(11) UK(250) France(2) Germany(2) Ireland(2) Israel(2) |
|    Netherlands(1) NZ(1) S.Africa(1) Scotland (1)                   |
|                Each family represents many people.                 |

                           FROM OUR READERS

Thank You, Trent

  With the exception of his son Lewis, immediate family members had
abandoned him. It took his death December 10, 1993, for them to even
try recalling the good man and the good times.
  By then, genuine memories had long been replaced by false memories.
There was no reconciliation, only revenge; no forgiveness, only
fabrication. Such is the legacy of False Memory Syndrome.
  The obituary said that Trent Joe Parker had died of complications
due to pneumonia. Those of us who recall the hell Trent suffered for
nearly three years -- and the effect that suffering had on his ulcer
-- know better. Trent was exhausted, both physically and spiritually.
  Still, he worked tirelessly until the end. Anyone associated very
long with the False Memory Syndrome Foundation knows the countless
hours Trent spent gathering and disseminating information on FMS,
recording television and radio programs, answering questions and
making phone calls. He was always willing to listen and to speak out.
He called me often to make sure I knew the latest information on FMS
or to make sure I had a copy of the most recent FMS article.
  I still remember our initial conversation in March 1992. As a result
of that conversation and several interviews that followed, Trent
became "John" in the first of a two-part newspaper story on FMS called
"False Memory Syndrome Taking its Toll on Families." He was proud to
have played a part in exposing the quackery behind "recovered
memories," and he was hopeful his story would spare others the anguish
he was experiencing.
  I remember how he missed the love and affection of his
grandchildren. Trent's children, with the exception of one son, cut
off all contact shortly after one daughter and two granddaughters
entered therapy and began casting allegations -- first at a baby
sitter, then at a coach, then at Trent. He was angered by his
children's gullibility, but he never stopped loving them.
  I remember how disgusted Trent was with the psychotherapists who had
charged his children and grandchildren $100 an hour to destroy his
family. "When is this all going to end?" he used to ask me after
hearing a new allegation against him, or after receiving another phone
call from a grieving parent or grandparent.
  Trent's wife divorced him last fall after following her children's
lead into therapy. The divorce, and the credibility his wife placed in
the allegations against him, crippled Trent's spirit. He phoned me the
day his divorce was final, calling it the worst day of his life. "She
was the only woman I ever loved," he said. When I asked him how he was
doing, he replied, "Not good." Trent kept fighting, but he never
recovered from the divorce.
  The last time we talked was two days before he died. Trent called to
make sure I knew about the article in the January Reader's Digest
titles "Justice Gone Crazy."
  Had I known the conversation would be our last, I would have kept
him on the phone longer. I would have thanked him for his courage in
being interviewed for that first newspaper story. I would have told
him that he had earned the love and respect of innumerable people. I
would have expressed gratitude for his tireless efforts. I would have
reminded him of the many people he had consoled and helped. I would
have told him how much he would be missed. And I would have said thank
  "We've lost our general," Helen Barr said when she called to tell me
Trent's battle had ended. The funeral was December 14. Sometimes I
still forget, and I wonder why Trent doesn't call anymore.
  We are poorer for his passing, but we are richer for having known
him. He showed us how to fight injustice. We must carry on the
fight. He would want that.
  We salute you, Trent -- our general.
                                                Michael Morris
                                            Spanish Fork, Utah
  Living in Germany when I was eleven years old, I heard the following
story told in whisper tones not long before World War 2 began in 1939.
  The ministers of interior affairs of Germany, Italy, and Japan were
discussing the recent improvements and progress made in their
respective countries.
  Reported the Italian minister, "In the field of medical science our
doctors have accomplished truly marvelous things. One team of
orthopedic surgeons, for example, amputated the legs of ten patients,
attached to each patient a set of newly invented artificial legs, and
within a few weeks all ten patients could walk, run, and jump just as
well as they had done with their natural legs."
  "In our land," the Japanese minister chimed in, "we have always had
a keen interest in developing better and better optic lenses. Indeed,
a team of our ophthalmologists surgically removed the eyes of 24
persons, implanted a set of artificial eyes equipped with newly
developed lenses, and all of these 24 patients can see better now than
they could see with their natural eyes."
  The German minister could hardly wait to speak. Said he, "You report
what astonishing progress has been made in your countries through the
efforts of experts in technology and medicine. In our land a simple
painter of Austrian origin removed the brains of about 90 million
people. He did so with mere words -- and to this day most of my fellow
citizens have not even noticed that something has been done to them."
  Until July 3, 1993, when I first learned about the False Memory
Syndrome Foundation, I repeatedly thought of this story and wondered
whether something similar "has been done with mere words" to a vast
number of our fellow citizens during the recent years.
  Misleading propaganda about unsubstantiated sexual abuse and incest
has proliferated. When mere claims of sexual abuse are equated with
evidence, and when persons never convicted of the sexual abuse of a
child are permanently stigmatized in our society, then it is obvious
that something is seriously wrong with the mentality and conscience of
many people; then it is obvious that they have lost their sense of
decency, their understanding of justice, their desire to know and to
guard the truth, and their respect for truthfulness and honor.
                                                   Robert Becker
December 6, 1993
Re: Vol2, No.10, FMSF Newsletter, page 4, "Institutionalized
  Do you have legal counsel? We think you owe your readers an apology,
and you need to retract what you have published about our
organization. The information you have published about S.O.U.P.! is
false and libelous.
  The quarterly list of perpetrators we publish is made up of names
that are of public record. We list the names of the accused allowed
defense. We verify. We have enclosed a sample copy for you. Check with
the courts. You will discover that the perpetrators we name have not
been denied defense.
  The FMSF knows nothing of our group's "processes" utilized while
compiling our lists so far. You need to retract your false statements
about S.O.U.P! and "by some people and institutions who claim to
support survivors."
  The retractions will be in the next issue of the FMS Foundation

  The above letter was anonymous. There was no return address. It was
postmarked Sacramento. Following is our response:

    We commented in our November newsletter on the activities of
  S.O.U.P.!  (Survivors Opposed Ubiquitous Perps!). That organization
  has now written us demanding retraction of statements it regards as
  "libelous." Under the heading "Institutional Accusation: No Defense
  Allowed" we had said that for $10.00 S.O.U.P.! offered to print the
  name of an accused molester in its newsletter, which it would
  circulate to neighbors, schools and employers. S.O.U.P.! (in an
  unsigned letter) now advises it checks public records to be sure the
  named "perpetrator" has in fact been accused of, charged with,
  indicted for, convicted of, sentenced for, or pleaded guilty to, as
  the case may be, sexual abuse of children or adults. Presumably
  persons who have been convicted or sentenced, or who have pled
  guilty to crime have been afforded "a defense" in the relevant
  tribunal. This would not be so, however, where there merely is an
  accusation, charge or indictment. S.O.U.P.! published what it call
  the "National Registry of Known Perpetrators." It is not the 
  purpose of FMSF to defend perpetrators or "known perpetrators," but
  rather to bring out the truth of the dangers of false memory and the
  harm done when it is the basis for untrue charges of child abuse.

  Two retractors wrote to tell us that someone sent them a S.O.U.P.!
newsletter. They wondered about the following statement in the
newsletter, "It won't be long before everyone you have contact with
will know you are a child molester/rapist." The retractors said they
didn't understand why anyone would send the S.O.U.P.! newsletter to

  We are writing to give you hope. Our 36 year old daughter refused to
be with people who would not believe that she had been sexually abused
as a baby. Her alienation had developed over six years with the course
of her therapy. Now a big change has taken place. We think it happened
because of her boyfriend who had confided his belief in our innocence
to us. She has made a turnarjound. She is attentive, affectionate and
acts as if nothing has happened. Has she retracted? I don't know
because we haven't discussed it. We are just accepting her return from
the hostile depressed pit she had fallen into - or really was shoved
into by her bungling therapist. $50,000 of our money went to this
therapist that she has now left. Perhaps "reconciliation" is more
accurate than retraction.
                                              A Mom
To Whom It May Concern,
  I recently saw your organization referenced in a "Dear Abby" column
in a local newspaper. I am very interested in any information you may
have or support options that may be available for my family. My
parents and I have been victimized for the past several years by my
only sibling (an older sister) who at age forty-five "suddenly
remembered with the help of the only therapist who ever truly
understood her" years of childhood abuse by my father. It has been a
long and difficult process that has very nearly destroyed my parents.
  I was raised in the same home, have encountered this therapist, have
observed my sister's behavior deteriorate and am convinced that FMS is
a very real possibility in our case. It is my opinion that my parents
and I are reasonable people who have offered my sister all that we
could but have come to feel that we are the ones abused...
                                                          A Sister

                      DESPERATELY SEEKING SATAN
                     by Barbara Grizzuti Harrison

from Mirabella magazine, December 1993
Copyright (c) 1993 by Barbara Grizzuti Harrison.
Reprinted by permission of Georges Borchardt, Inc. for author.

  According to the National Committee to Prevent Child Abuse, almost
three million cases of child abuse and neglect were reported in 1992;
an estimated twelve hundred children -- burned, scalded, bitten,
strangled, beaten -- died. These things are real. And they are evil. Not
sufficiently evil, however (at least to talk-show hosts), to engender
sustained and outraged interest...unless they are sensationally
  On TV, in the media, our attention is directed not to the everyday
violence, the ordinary and terrible reality of domestic child abuse,
but to bizarre tales of satanic-ritual child abuse. We are immersed in
the phenomenon of "recovery memory" -- that phenomenon allowing a
woman in her mid-thirties to resurrect memories of sexual molestation
that occurred when she was as young as six months old. We are
addressed by people who claim to be suffering from multiple-
personality disorders, said, by those nominally afflicted, to have
arisen from their hapless involvement in an international satanic
conspiracy and their long-buried memories of parental abuse. Tabloids
screech of whole day-care centers being corrupted by an insatiable
(and wildly inventive) degenerate.
  From time to time, children are made spectacles by such purveyors of
fake compassion as Maury Povich, who had no compunction about asking a
seventeen year old claiming to have been sexualy abused from the ages
of two to five at the McMartin Preschool in California: "Do you
remember specifically what happened?" (The principles in the McMartin
trial were not convicted after being tried by a hung jury.)
  Povich also asked the teenager what effect the trial had had on him:
"I got to come to New York and do a whole bunch of TV shows," the
beleaguered boy said, giving rise, inescapably, to the question of
what, in this mirrored hall of grotesquerie, is cause and what is
effect. Do TV talk shows govern popular culture and foster perceptions
of evil? Do people purchase their fifteen minutes of fame at the cost
of ever

Are you sure you weren't ritually abused as a child? We have ways of
making you remember...

  I remember how, in junior high school, we all envied a kid who broke
her arm and wore it in a sling--such delicious attention she got; we
envied, as children will, her singularity. Will children now envy
those children who secure attention by publicly denouncing family
members? And why in the world do parents allow their little children
to be salaciously questioned by treacly, arrogant talk-show hosts:
  How many animals did you torture? How many did you kill? Did you eat
them? Tell me about the time you helped to kill another child.
  What is going on here? A hell of a lot.
  Fewer than half of the cases of child abuse or neglect reported in
1992 were actually opened for investigation. We are distracted from
the banality and reality of everyday evil by the focus on the McMartin
case and that of Margaret Kelly Michaels, who was convicted of 115
counts of molestation against nineteen children at the Wee Care center
in New Jersey, including forcing them to lick peanut butter from her
genitals and stick toys and utensils into their sexual orifices.
(Michaels was sentenced to forty-seven years in prison; her conviction
was overturned by an appellate court -- she will be retried.) How was
it possible for nobody, no adult body, to have seen, heard, smelled or
suspected such abuse in an open setting? Exceedingly bizarre cases of
recovered memory and satanic-ritual abuse claim our attention; the
devastating abuse that goes on in the home under cover of cozy
domesticity is insufficiently addressed.
  When, at the persistent prompting of social workers or
psychotherapists, children -- or adults -- suddenly remember exotic
buried memories, it's wise to remember the truth of one's own life: we
don't forget the most terrible things that happen to us; we remember
them vividly and live with the consciousness of them. In an article
written last year for an academic journal, Dr. Paul McHugh, director
of the department of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Johns
Hopkins University School of Medicine, points out that severe traumas
are "amplified in consciousness, remaining like grief to be reborn and
  Children are suggestible; children fantasize. To forget this is to
deny the presumption of innocence to anyone accused of heinous crimes
against children.
  Memories can be implanted in the minds of children by hectoring,
bullying interviewers. Children, who like to please, are rewarded when
they tell a zealot what she or he demands to hear; the questions
become the answers: an echo chamber. According to Maggie Bruck, Ph.D.,
a psychologist at McGill University, "Many people who specialize in
[sexual-abuse] cases have a preconceived notion of what happened, and
in the course of questioning suggest it to the child, who then reports
it as though it were true." The results of scientific studies with
children under the age of six conducted by Stephen J. Ceci, Ph.D., a
psychologist at Cornell, and summarized in an article in The New York
Times, revealed the case of a four-year-old boy who was asked whether
he had ever been to the hospital. He replied, truthfully, that he had
not. But the following week he answered that he had, and that he'd
cried. Gradually, in response to the same question every week, he
elaborated, fancifully but not incredibly. By the eleventh week, he
presented his interviewer with a detailed account of an injury (finger
caught in a mousetrap) and a trip to the hospital. Was the child
lying? Objectively, yes. But his motivation was to suit his answers
to the question, in order to endear himself to an adult.,.or maybe the
little fellow just got bored and said to himself: Anything to shut
that guy up.
  Straining credulity even more than Mc-Martin-type cases are people
who lay claim to having suffered satanic-ritual child abuse by a
network of conspirators, including both Nazi scientists and Jews as
well as the CIA. (The people who tell these stories look normal -- but
then so did all those guys, the staple of previous years' talk shows,
who were taken for jaunts in UFO's by pea-green aliens.) The FBI has
found no evidence that a national or international conspiracy of
mind-controlling Satanists responsible for molestation and murder
exists; of course, for those determined to believe, the obvious and
infuriating answer is, "Well, the FBI is part of it." "Word circulated
in police workshops that Satanic cults were sacrificing between fifty
and sixty thousand people every year in the U.S., although the annual
national total of homicides averages less than 25,000." (Italics
mine.) This information comes to us from Lawrence Wright's brilliantly
reported "Remembering Satan" in The New Yorker in May 1993. What gives
Wright's story its horrific edge is the recognition that not only can
anybody be accused but that one can become complicit in one's own
  When Paul R. Ingram, to all appearances a model citizen and deputy
sheriff in a small Washington town, was accused of abuse by two of his
adult daughers, he said, "I can't see myself doing this" -- a rather
wispy denial, followed immediately by, "There may be a dark side of me
that I don't know about." He was willing -- almost eager -- to accept
guilt because, he said, he had a "hard time" hugging his kids "or even
telling them that I love them, and...I just know that that's not
natural." (The poor man learned his kiss-and-communicate pop-culture
lessons well.) Ingram apparently believed that if he confessed, his
memories would come back, along with contrition and forgiveness. A
Pentacostal fundamentalist (the sanctuary of his church, Wright tells
us, "has the ambience of the set of a daytime television talk show"),
Ingram declared, in spite of the fact that his daughters' stories were
incoherent and inconsistent, that "my girls know me. They wouldn't lie
about something like this." When he was asked to account for his
"failure" of memory, he replied -- as a model talk-show guest might --
that he had probably been abused himself as a child. His daughters'
stories escalated: they uncovered memories of their brothers -- and
their mother -- being abused. And escalated: they were victims, they
said, of a conspiracy of sex criminals who met for weekly poker games
at the Ingram family home. There were orgies of self-disclosure and
self-revulsion, as if everyone needed to be found guilty. At one
point, Ingram said he was probably guilty of "emotional abuse," lack
of communication and all that stuff talk shows routinely accuse us
of. Ingram viewed his own parallel life, that life which up to now he
had had no memory of, as if it were a horror movie; he entered a
guilty plea to six counts of rape. (Ingram has since tried to withdraw
his guilty plea, but the Washington State Supreme Court upheld his
conviction; he is now serving a twenty-year sentence with no chance of
parole until 2001.)
  Ingram was subjected to a kind of torture: during the long hours of
his interrogation, he claims he was inculcated with the assurance that
innocence -- denial of guilt -- was proof of guilt.
  Why would anyone so eagerly confess to unspeakable crimes? Ingram's
(recanted) insistence on his "dark side" offers a clue: fundamentalist
religions predispose people to a belief in duality -- they break the
world in two, absolute good and absolute evil. It is difficult for a
fundamentalist to countenance the notion that good and evil are often
braided, that good comes from bad and bad from good.
  The religious far right has joined forces -- wonder of wonders? --
with Ms. Magazine in espousing a militant belief in the conspiracy of
satanic abusers. "Cult ritual abuse is the logical extreme of the
oppression we live with everyday," says one Ms. correspondent; another
says, "Cults are the distilled versions of men bonding around
distorted ritual, creating a false world for hapless women and
children." This alliance is not so odd as it appears on the surface:
there is a coarse ideology tainting rational feminism that sees the
world, just as religious fundamentalists do, in terms of good/evil;
men/women; oppressor/oppressed, an ideology that espouses one
fundamental (and tidy) source of evil.
  We know who loses from emphasis on the bizarre: children who suffer
genuine domestic abuse. Do we know who profits?
  A network of therapists -- many of whom use "narcoanalysis,"
hypnosis and drugs, to free "repressed " memories -- profits. Moral
crusaders, whose temperaments thrive on wild injustices -- the
ordinary pain of ordinary human life being apparently insufficient to
their needs -- profit. And, as Jeffrey S. Victor, Ph.D., points out in
his book, Satanic Panic, lecturers and people who sell training videos
about repressed memories profit.
  Without the societally sanctioned notion of "recovered memory,"
allegations would not be brought against parents for abuse reputedly
perpetrated decades ago.
  But what is memory? How does it work? (People with "recovered
memories" have been known to speak of "memory" and of something else
called "conscious memory"; there is no scientific -- or for that
matter poetic -- proof that such categories exist.) What writer Alain
Robbe-Grillet said in The Paris Review about the creative process
applies to "recovered memory": "Memory belongs to the imagination.
Human memory is not like a computer which records things; it is part
of the imaginative process, on the same terms as invention." Our
stories -- which are always, in fact, stories about stories -- serve
our present world view, our ephemeral moods or cultural imperatives.
As Robyn M. Dawes, professor of psychology at Carnegie Mellon, wrote,
"We quite literally 'make up stories' about our lives, the world, and
reality in general. Often it is the story that creates the memory,
rather than vice versa." We are all unwitting liars; it is a way to
make sense and order of our histories.
  Memory reconstructs, deconstructs. It does not exist in lucid,
unpolluted form. Memory is imagination; a troubled person is well able
to construct memories around desire...around pain. And with a not-
disinterested therapist to lead that person...BANG! a shattering
memory is born.
  Suspicion, in the world of recovered memory, always leads to
confirmation. In The Sexual Healing Journey (the bible of recovered-
rememberers), Wendy Maltz writes: "Memory loss can be an important way
of coping with abuse...Victims of extremely violent and bizarre abuse
may suffer traumatic amnesia...Memory loss protects us from
overwhelming or continuous psychological strain...When memories of
events and feelings do start to surface," she says, "trust them,"
although "they may not make sense initially." Then ask yourself: "Who
would have been the likely perpetrators?"
  This is how voodoo works; this is how inquisitions work. This is how
disregard for objective truth works.
  According to one school of thought, whether "recovered memories" are
true or not is beside the therapeutic point. Whether or not the abuse
actually occurred, clinicians must treat the pain of the alleged
  I was for a longtime inclined to this point of view myself; I
thought, Well, if someone is in so much pain that she needs to
construct false memories, the memories are probably symbolic of
emotional abuse...and it's the pain that has to be treated. That's
true, as far as it goes -- as long as it doesn't go into the
courtroom. What is left out of the equation is the rapacity or
ineptitude of therapists (and talk-show hosts and other interested
parties) who encourage and root for "recovered memories." More
importantly, the formulation that the pain, not the truth, matters
leaves out the family members who are wrongly accused, with such
devastating consequences as one can hardly imagine.
  We need to protect children from real abuse. We need to protect
families (who are often confroned with allegations of abuse when child
custody is at stake or when there is a family feud or vendetta).
  But how?
  Experts who were shown videotapes of children recounting both true
and false memores were correct about the accuracy of a child's account
"about one-third of the time," Ceci says. This is appalling; how --
short of definitive medical evidence -- do we go about sorting truth
from error?
  Tragically, there is no ready answer. There are only questions and
  Women account for 90 percent of the "repressed memories" reported to
the False Memory Syndrome Foundation in Philadephia. Why?
  Given the eagerness of people like Ingram to confess to even more
charges than are brought against them, should we ask ourselves for
what sins -- communal and/or individual -- we are in fact atoning? If
charges of molestation may be "symbolic," so may confessions to sexual
abuse be symbolic.
  It is possible that, in this age of AIDS, false charges of sexual
abuse reflect a virulent strain of anti-eroticism?
  Our culture has largely divorced sex fromlove; it has also denied
the transcendence of love. What do I want? What will I get out of it?
people ask themselves of relationships, making lists, as if they were
going to a supermarket. The very use of the word "relationship," as
opposed to love, is a form of reductionism and utilitarianism. Does
the denial of the transcendence of love create a climate in which
false charges gain acceptance?
  We have problems with the word "evil," which has suffered underuse
in our time; conspiratorial notions of satanic abuse may be replacing
a valid but complicated theological concept. We are, according to all
indices, a religious people, but legally and for public consumption,
we are determinedly secular. Are we suffering a kind of dislocation as
a result, and is this dislocation finding its voice in charges of
satanic abuse? Where, after all, do you go when the seven deadly sins
are no longer sensational enough to provide entertainment fodder?
  Every so often -- think of Salem, think of the 1950s -- America
seems to need a purge, a catharsis, a form of inquisition; it is
interesting, for example, that the "network" of Satanists has been
compared to communist "cells." I wish someone smarter than I would
tell me why we need to convulse in this manner; I think we are going
through another such period now...attendant, perhaps, on culture
shock, unassimilated social change?
  I return to talk shows, which are a loony mixture of voyeurism,
exhibitionism, confessional, political forum, bastardized news,
bread-and-circus entertainment, syrup and malice, anger and angst.
They are apparently the vehicle of debate; in fact, on every single
talk show, layers of complex experience are made to yield only one
socially and politically correct explanation and solution, such as,
Victims must be believed. I used to think that premise was a good
one. Now I think not. We have forgotten that people lie. At the same
time, I'd be loathe to relinquish the presumption of innocence; how do
we respect victims and maintain that presumption at the same time?
  I've spent hours and hours reading about child abuse, recovered
memories and satanic ritual abuse, and it is clear to me that, except
for fanatics, rigid ideologues and profiteers of the soul, everyone
who applies her intelligence to this vexed subject suffers a sense of
futility and frustration. Few are so immodest as to claim to have the
answers. Where do we find the truth? I wish I knew. It is only the
truth that sets us free.
/                                                                    \
|    Analogizing recovered memories of years of sex abuse to World   |
| War I veterans who many years later recover scenes of combat mixes |
| apples and oranges. Veterans not recalling every bloody battle     |
| scene are not the same as their repressing the entire experience   |
| of having been in the war. They knew they were veterans.           |
|                                              Richard Green MD, JD  |
|                  Professor of Psychiatry at UCLA and an attrorney  |
|                             LA Times, Dec 4, 1993, Editorial Page  |

                      ADDITIONS TO BIBLIOGRAPHY

___095 "Oedipal Wrecks," by E. Fuller Torrey. The Washington Monthly, 
           January/February 1992  [$3.00}

___173 "False memory group looks into abuse that never happened," by
         John Lyons. Winnipeg Free Press, December 7, 1992.  [$1.00}

___291 "I Forgot to Remember to Forget," by Wes Eichenwald. The Boston
           Phoenix, October 15, 1993.  [$2.00}

___295 "Trial by Accusation," Review & Outlook commentary. The Wall
                Street Journal, December 1, 1993.  [$1.00]

___592 Wakefield, H. & Underwager, R. (1993) "A Paradigm Shift for
     Expert Witnesses," Issues in Child Abuse Accusations. Summer
     1993, 3: 156-167.

___ FMSF Newsletters, Vol 2, 1993 [$15.00]

                            FMSF MEETINGS
              Families & Professionals Working Together 


Memory and Reality
June 3-5, 1994
Kansas City
Continuing Education Credit Approved

Speakers will include members of the FMSF Advisory Board. Sessions
will be held Friday through Sunday noon to be followed with a public
lecture Sunday afternoon.

May 21-22, 1994
Michigan State University
Lansing, MI

American Psychiatric Association
Doubletree Hotel
Philadelphia, PA
Wednesday, May 25, 1994
2-5:00 pm Seminar Speakers:
Drs. Green, Lief,
McHugh, Singer

Call the contact person listed for time and location of meeting.
key:  (MO) = monthly

Central Coast 
  Carole (805) 967-8058

North County Escondido  
  Joe & Marlene (619)745-5518
Rancho Cucamonga Group  
  Marilyn (909) 985-7890  
  1st Monday, (MO) - 7:30 pm

San Jose-San Francisco Bay Area  
  Jack & Pat (408) 425-1430  
  Last Saturday, Bi-Monthly, 

Valencia, CA  
  Jane & Mark (805) 947-4376  
  4th Saturday (MO)10:00 am
  Roy (303) 221-4816
  4th Saturday, (MO)1:00 pm  

Boca Raton,  
  Esther (407) 364-8290  
  Every Thursday, 1:30 pm

Kansas City
  Pat (913) 238-2447 or
  Jan (816) 276-8964
  2nd Sunday (MO)

  Dixie (606) 356-9309

Annapolis area  
  Carol (410) 647-6339  
  Sun., February 6, 3:00 pm

Grand Rapids Area - Jenison
  Catharine (606) 363-1354
  2nd Monday (MO)

Michigan Information Newsletter
P O Box 15044, Ann Arbor, MI 48106
(313) 461-6213
Meeting notices & state topics  
  Terry & Collette 
  (507) 642-3630

Cincinnati Area
  Bob (502) 957-2378


Chelmsford, Massachusetts  
  2nd Sunday (MO) 1:00 pm

NEW JERSEY (South) -

Wayne, PA  
  Jim & Joanne (215) 783-0396
TEXAS (Central)  
  Nancy & Jim  (512) 478-8395

  Katie & Leo (414) 476-0285
  To participate in a phone tree.


Vancouver & Mainland
  Ruth (604) 925-1539

Victoria & Vancouver Island
  John (604) 721-3219
  3rd Tuesday (MO) 7:30 pm

  Joan (204) 257-9444
  1st Sunday (MO)

  Pat (416) 445-1995

Dr. Ken Goodwin

Dr. Goodyear-Smith
tel 0-9-415-8095
fax 0-9-415-8471 

Affiliated Group
Adult Children Accusing Parents
Roger Scotford (0) 225-868682

To list a meeting:  
Mail or fax information to Nancy 2 months in advance of meeting date,
i.e., for April newsletter, send by Feb. 25th. Standing meetings will
continue to be listed unless notified otherwise by contact person.

/                                                                    \
|       Do you have access to e-mail?  Send a message to             |
|                                         |
| if you want to receive notices of radio and television broadcasts  |
| about FMS.  All the message need say is "add to the FMS list". It  |
| would be useful, but not necessary, if you add your full name (all |
| addresses and names will remain strictly confidential).  The list  |
| is not a "bulletin board". Its only use is to send occasional      |
| notices of broadcasts.                                             |

                        AUDIO TAPES AVAILABLE

  Audio tape formed from the life experience of retractor, Janet
Puhr. The approach is designed to lead a daughter down a situational
path of reality in the hope that this will bring the daughter back
into the light on heart-to-heart journey back home to love and good
times. 50 min. Cost $30 (includes shipping. For 2-say express add $3.)
Make checks payable to: Janet Puhr, PO. Box 293, Chicago Ridge, IL
60415. Enclose name, address and phone number. (Editor's apology for
listing this as a video-tape. It is an audio tape. Ms. Puhr informed
us that replacement tapes will be sent to those whose tapes contained
noise interference.)

                        VIDEO TAPES AVAILABLE

by  Richard A. Gardner, M.D.
   Seventy-five minute recording of a presentation to the FMSF in New
York City on Sept. 19, 1993. Describes Dr. Gardner's views of the
factors which have brought about the sex-abuse hysteria which we have
been witnessing in the US since the early 1980's. Valuable to
therapists, lawyers and those in a position to help families. To
order, 800-544-6162. In NJ call 201-567-7295 or FAX 201-567-8956. Cost
$15 (NJ residents add 6% sales tax--$.90/tape) plus $2 postage &
handling or write to Creative Therapetics, Inc., P O BOX 522,
Cresskill, NJ 07626-0317.

Criminal Lawyers' Association Conference
The Abuse and Misuse of Science:
Recovered Memories 
November 5-7, 1993  Toronto
Contact Alan D. Gold, Barrister, 20 Adelaid Street East, Suite 210,
Toronto, On M5C 2T6, 416-368-1726,fax:416-368-6811

The FMSF Newsletter is published 10 times a year by the False Memory
Syndrome Foundation. A subscription is included in membership fees.
Others may subscribe by sending a check or money order, payable to FMS
Foundation, to the address below. 1993 subscription rates: USA: 1 year
$20, Student $10; Canada: 1 year $25; (in U.S. dollars); Foreign: 1
year $35. Single issue price: $3

FMS Foundation
3401 Market Street, Suite 130

This address and the phone numbers have changed as of July 15, 2000
Philadelphia, PA 19104-3315
Phone 215-387-1865
ISSN # 1069-0484

Pamela Freyd, Ph.D.,  Executive Director

           FMSF Scientific and Professional Advisory Board

January 17, 1993
Terence W. Campbell, Ph.D., Clinical and Forensic Psychology, Sterling
Heights, MI; Rosalind Cartwright, Rush Presbyterian St. Lukes Medical
Center, Chicago, IL; Jean Chapman, Ph.D., University of Wisconsin,
Madison, WI; Loren Chapman, Ph.D., University of Wisconsin, Madison,
WI; Robyn M. Dawes, Ph.D., Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA;
David F. Dinges, Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania, The Institute of
Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Fred Frankel, M.B.Ch.B.,
D.P.M., Beth Israel Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA;
George K. Ganaway, M.D., Emory University of Medicine, Atlanta, GA;
Martin Gardner, Author, Hendersonville, NC; Rochel Gelman, Ph.D.,
University of California, Los Angeles, CA; Henry Gleitman, Ph.D.,
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Lila Gleitman, Ph.D.,
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Richard Green, M.D.,
J.D., UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA; David A. Halperin,
M.D., Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; Ernest Hilgard,
Ph.D., Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; John Hochman, M.D., UCLA
Medical School, Los Angeles, CA; David S. Holmes, Ph.D., University of
Kansas, Lawrence, KS; Philip S. Holzman, Ph.D., Harvard University,
Cambridge, MA; John Kihlstrom, Ph.D., University of Arizona, Tucson,
AZ; Harold Lief, M.D., University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA;
Elizabeth Loftus, Ph.D., University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Paul
McHugh, M.D., Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Harold Merskey,
D.M., University of Western Ontario, London, Canada; Ulric Neisser,
Ph.D., Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Richard Ofshe, Ph.D., University
of California, Berkeley, CA; Martin Orne, M.D., Ph.D., University of
Pennsylvania, The Institute of Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia,
PA; Loren Pankratz, Ph.D., Oregon Health Sciences University,
Portland, OR; Campbell Perry, Ph.D., Concordia University, Montreal,
Canada; Michael A. Persinger, Ph.D., Laurentian University, Ontario,
Canada; August T.  Piper, Jr., M.D., Seattle, WA; Harrison Pope, Jr.,
M.D., Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA; James Randi, Author and
Magician, Plantation, FL; Carolyn Saari, Ph.D., Loyola University,
Chicago, IL; Theodore Sarbin, Ph.D., University of California, Santa
Cruz, CA; Thomas A. Sebeok, Ph.D., Indiana Univeristy, Bloomington,
IN; Louise Shoemaker, Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia,
PA; Margaret Singer, Ph.D., University of California, Berkeley, CA;
Ralph Slovenko, J.D., Ph.D., Wayne State University Law School,
Detroit, MI; Donald Spence, Ph.D., Robert Wood Johnson Medical Center,
Princeton, NJ; Jeffrey Victor, Ph.D., Jamestown Community College,
Jamestown, NY; Hollida Wakefield, M.A., Institute of Psychological
Therapies, Northfield, MN; Louis Jolyon West, M.D., UCLA School of
Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.